Header Bidding vs. Waterfall: What’s The Difference?

In this blog we will understand the difference between Header Bidding AKA prebid and Waterfall model. It is crucial for growing publishers to increase revenue by using effective new age ad delivery strategies. In recent years, two key such strategies are: Waterfall and header bidding. Comprehending the differences between these two methods can have a significant impact on a publishers earning. This article explains the differences between Waterfall and header bidding, by focusing on their benefits, drawbacks, and mechanisms.

The field of advanced public relations is always evolving, as publishers search for new and innovative methods to modify their content. Two strategies that are frequently utilized to improve promotion conveyance and increase revenue are waterfall and header bidding . Although each has advantages, realizing how they differ is essential to making the most of them. This piece explores the intricacies of header offering and header bidding , providing tidbits of information about each strategy’s possibilities and their individual benefits and drawbacks.

What is Header Bidding?

Header bidding, also known as advance offering or pre-offering, is an automated public relations tactic that enables publishers to offer stock to different promotion trades in the interim before making judgments and submitting them to their promotion servers. By creating a serious environment in which request sources bid gradually, this strategy may increase the distributer’s overall promotion revenue.

How Header Bidding Works

1. Ad Request: An advertisement demand is raised when a customer visits a publisher’s website.
2. Header Bidding Code: Located in the site’s header, this code continuously sends bid notifications to various interest sources.
3. Real-Time Bidding:  Request providers gradually present their offerings, such as promotion trades and SSPs
4. Bid Evaluation: The publisher’s promotion server ships off the most notable bid.
5. Ad Display: The customer is shown the winning advertising by the advertisement server.

Benefits of Header Bidding

• Increased Revenue: publishers can get more CPMs by allowing many interest sources to offer concurrently.
• Improved Yield Management: Executive yield has improved as a result of publishers’ increased control over their stock.
• Reduced Latency: Since the offering system runs ahead of the promotion server call, there may be less overall idleness during the delivery of advertisements.

Drawbacks of Header Bidding

• Complex Implementation: Configuring header offerings is a complex process that calls for specialist knowledge.
• Increased Latency: Inadequately improved header-providing arrangements may result in deferrals even if they can reduce idle time.
• Higher Costs: Handling a variety of interest sources and offerings may result in higher functional costs.

What is Waterfall?

The waterfall method, also known as daisy chaining, is an automated public relations technique that involves suggesting promotional material to sources to progressively seek information. If the primary interest source is unable to fill the stock, the publisher sets down a boundary request and proceeds to the next, etc.

How Waterfall Works

1. Ad Request: When a customer enters the website, a promotion demand is triggered.
2. Sequential Bidding: The most notable source of need requests receives the solicitation first.
3. Fill Rate Check: The promotion is supplied if the interest source can handle the solicitation. If not, the request is sent to the next source of interest further down the chain.
4. Ad Display: This loop continues until either all request sources are used up or advertising is provided.

Benefits of Waterfall

• Simpler Setup: Compared to header providing, the waterfall approach is easier to implement and manage.
• Lower Costs: Typically, managing successive interest sources entails less functional costs.

Drawbacks of Waterfall

• Lower Revenue Potential: Since the stock may be sold at less aggressive rates, the sequential nature may result in lower CPMs. 
• Inefficient Yield Management: Unbending design may result in executives wasting their time and money, and it can also close fantastic opportunities.
• Increased Latency: Continual provisioning may lengthen the duration required to fulfill a promotion, resulting in increased inactivity.

Header Bidding vs. Waterfall: A Comparative Analysis

• Revenue Generation

Header bidding generally offers higher revenue potential compared to the waterfall method due to its competitive bidding environment. By allowing multiple demand sources to bid simultaneously, publishers can achieve better CPMs and optimize their ad revenue.

• Implementation Complexity

Because of its serious offering atmosphere, header offerings often provide better earning potential as compared to the waterfall approach. publishers may improve their marketing income and get higher CPMs by allowing several interest sources to offer at the same time.

• Latency Considerations

Both methods may worry about being idle. While header offering, when properly advanced, might reduce dormancy, it can also result in deferrals if not handled with precision. Because the waterfall technique is sequential, it has increased idleness by nature.

• Yield Management

Header providing increases the value of each impression through shrewd offering, which results in a more effective yield across the board. It’s interesting to note that the waterfall technique’s rigid requirement structure might lead to wasted yield on the board.

Conclusion

Every tactic in the header bidding vs waterfall conflict has unique advantages and disadvantages. Header offerings come with complexity and probable inertness difficulties, but they also provide more income possibilities, further developed for the executives, and a competitive offering. The waterfall technique is less complex and practical however may prompt lower income and wasteful promotion conveyance. publishers should gauge these variables and pick the technique that best lines up with their adaptation objectives and specialized abilities.

How MagicBid Will Help You

MagicBid provides advanced solutions for app, web, and CTV monetization by leveraging cutting-edge ad tech for websites. With MagicBid, publishers can optimize their inventory through real-time bidding, audience segmentation, and personalized ad experiences. These features ensure effective monetizing of web traffic, maximizing revenue across all platforms. Whether you are looking to enhance your app monetization strategy or improve ad performance on your website or CTV, MagicBid’s comprehensive suite of tools is designed to meet your needs in the evolving digital ad ecosystem.

Connect with us now to get a free ad revenue evaluation.